Skip to Main Content
IBM Data and AI RegTech Ideas Portal

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea

Help IBM prioritize your ideas and requests

The IBM team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The offering manager team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at IBM works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.

Receive notification on the decision

Some ideas can be implemented at IBM, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.


For product documentation, see Knowledge Center.
Create and View Support Cases and Use the Discussion Forum here

Shorter URL for this site is: http://ibm.biz/WFS-Ideas or https://ibm.biz/RegTech-Ideas

ADD A NEW IDEA

FILTER BY CATEGORY

IBM Safer Payments

Showing 111 of 995

New AML Type/AML Timestamp field (Duplicate of SP Fraud Type/Timestamp)

A field similar to SP Fraud type/SP Fraud Timestamp is needed for AML marking purposes We have had cases where we would need to mark a transaction as both fraud and an AML type This would have the same function as SP fraud type/timestamp field as ...
11 months ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Submitted

Force the system to register specific characters as normal text

Characters which provide specific function within Safer Payments such as (),{},~,*,? cannot be interpreted as plain text for rule writing. Merchant names, for example, may enter the system with these characters.
about 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments 0 Submitted

Allow for the reference of Rule Name, Rule UID, and Rule Comment within a conclusion

Would like the ability to reference the Rule Name, Rule UID, or Rule Comment within a conclusion. For rule auditing, we may assign unique values to an overwritable input on a rule by rule basis. Safer Payments already inherently assigns a Unique V...
about 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments 0 Submitted

Integrate Case Transition with MEMO Save

Currently users have to enter memos and then save them and then transition the case to close. It would be helpful to have the memos automatically save when cases are transitioned from one state to another to avoid any lost messages.
about 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments 0 Submitted

Separate Mandater/user privileges for Intercept vs Monitoring models/rules

Providing access to Model writing provides access to both intercept or case creation models. Would like these unlinked.
about 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments 0 Submitted

Separate mandator/user privileges for Rule Generation and Simulation

Simulation and Generation are tied together, if you can access one you get the other. Would like these unlinked.
about 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments 0 Submitted

Special Fraud Index

We intend to have a special Fraud Index that is updated when a transaction is set as fraudulent. Currently, when we set transactions as fraudulent (using a merge) SaferPayments does not re-compute/insert indexes. We intend to have a new index typ...
almost 2 years ago in IBM Safer Payments 0 Submitted

Upload Files

Upload Files - In the SP front end, when we tag one transaction as fraud, the name of the user who made it, doesn’t appears in the field “FRAUD_CLASSIFICATION_USER_NAME”. It must appears.Create meta attributes (FRAUD_CLASSIFICATION_DATETIME, FRAUD...
over 2 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Future consideration

Access Restriction to upper Mandators

To allow merchants interaction with SaferPayments SIBS FPS is planning to give the access to them. We were informed that merchants will not be able to change but will be able to see rules at higher mandators lever. This is not desirable. As a proc...
over 2 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Business 0 Under review

Improve quality and trackability of (outgoing) HTTP system log error messages

Currently it is difficult to track a failed http message back to a case, because there are no shared ID between those logs. Best option you have is using the timestamps. Please provide an option to put a HTTP Message ID used in the System Log in t...
about 2 months ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Submitted