Skip to Main Content
IBM Data and AI RegTech Ideas Portal

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea

Help IBM prioritize your ideas and requests

The IBM team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The offering manager team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at IBM works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.

Receive notification on the decision

Some ideas can be implemented at IBM, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.

For product documentation, see Knowledge Center.
Create and View Support Cases and Use the Discussion Forum here

Shorter URL for this site is: or



All ideas

Showing 335

Item Modified in TCR needs to be rechecked in Duplicate Detect

Any item (non-insert) that has a MICR field (Ser #, Acct #, TC/PC or Amount) changed during TCR must be looped back to the Duplicate Detect process. This will drive the “changed item” to be re-evaluated in the Duplicate flow.
over 3 years ago in FTM for Check Services / Usability 1 Not under consideration

FTMV30012_Dev2_NIT Request that IBM review FTM for compliance with NIT WAS Standards re: Section 22 > logging

Application LoggingThe WebSphere Application Server logs such as SystemOut.log and SystemErr.log are for use by WebSphere Application Server only and cannot be used by the application for any type of logging. Applications should utilize an approve...
over 3 years ago in FTM for Check Services / Security 0 Not under consideration

Non Proof Items

Non Proof Items are required in a third party product which is the system of record for all transactions. These items should be sent in the X9 file used to integrate with the 3rd party product.
over 3 years ago in FTM for Check Services / Integration 0 Not under consideration

CHKD-860 : FTM4C - add Bank of First Deposit info to BCC transaction screens

Problem description and business impact The BOFD RT, BOFD Sequence Number and BOFD Date are displayed for return items on the IPD BCC screen, but they do not appear anywhere on any of the FTM BCC screens. The fields that appear to be intended for ...
over 3 years ago in FTM for Check Services / Dashboard, Reports & Insights 0 Not under consideration

Add screen refresh to the Inbound and Outbound Physical Transmissions Screens

.Inbound and outbound physical transmission need to be constantly monitored for any disruption in service so the issue can be quickly turned over to technical support for timely resolution. Delays in resolution can have financial impact on both th...
over 3 years ago in FTM for Check Services / Usability 0 Not under consideration

Record ID value shown as zero in FTM Inbound Transmission Hierarchy page

The Record Id field in Inbound transmission Hierarchy -> Debit Details -> Check Data is shown as zero. If this field in the UI is the CPCS record id, then it should be corrected. If not, we need the CPCS Record Id (decimal value 0 - 255) fie...
over 3 years ago in FTM for Check Services / Usability 1 Not under consideration

Need the ability to set the Balancing Rule at the Customer_Type level not just the Product level.

if there are 2 Partners A and B and both Partners are Product Type POD and if Product Type Balancing rule for POD is Transaction. I would like for Partner A to be at Transaction Balancing but I?d like to override Partner B to be Control Balancing.
over 3 years ago in FTM for Check Services / Technology Stack Support (OS, Middleware, Protocols) 0 Not under consideration

Display USER_CODE separately on the transmission hierarchy screen.

Sorry for the delay on this. I discussed this with the developer and also the architect. We have been calling the DOCUMENT TYPE field the "record id" for awhile.This is not something that we would want to change. The USER_CODE being displayed as t...
over 3 years ago in FTM for Check Services / Dashboard, Reports & Insights 2 Not under consideration

Undo Function for operator decisioned DUDE items

Within DUDE provide "undo" button, or goback button to be able to reverse a decision made on a prior item to flag or unflag Duplicate flag status. Provide operator statistics on the use of such button by operator ID for MIS reporting and training ...
over 3 years ago in FTM for Check Services / Usability 1 Not under consideration

Ability to see the detail when filtering by OOB.

When filtering by OOB in TCR you only see the line that is OOB and not the detail. For control balancing that's the BUNDLE and for TRANSACTION its the credit.
over 3 years ago in FTM for Check Services / Usability 1 Not under consideration