Skip to Main Content
IBM Data and AI RegTech Ideas Portal

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea

Help IBM prioritize your ideas and requests

The IBM team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The offering manager team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at IBM works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.

Receive notification on the decision

Some ideas can be implemented at IBM, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.


For product documentation, see Knowledge Center.
Create and View Support Cases and Use the Discussion Forum here

Shorter URL for this site is: http://ibm.biz/WFS-Ideas or https://ibm.biz/RegTech-Ideas

ADD A NEW IDEA

FILTER BY CATEGORY

IBM Safer Payments

Showing 79

Provide doublet detection at the message type level, not just at the mandator level

The feature would allow doublets to have different configurations based on the type of message being processed. It would remove complexities of having to develop doublet detections across a wide variety of message types. It would reduce chance of ...
over 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments 0 Future consideration

Create error message or revert back to SS home page when a user is not configured in Guardian.

When a user has SS access, but is not configured in SP, the SP log in screen displays. The user will attempt to log in here and will not be able to continue- this can be very confusing and cause phone calls to our support team. We need either an e...
about 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Future consideration

New AML Type/AML Timestamp field (Duplicate of SP Fraud Type/Timestamp)

A field similar to SP Fraud type/SP Fraud Timestamp is needed for AML marking purposes We have had cases where we would need to mark a transaction as both fraud and an AML type This would have the same function as SP fraud type/timestamp field as ...
about 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Not under consideration

Support multi-sort and multi-filters within Queries

The old UI supported multi-sort within query results but that is no longer supported in the new UI. Additionally, being able to further customize filters with multiple values or a "does not contain" option would be beneficial.
about 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments 0 Future consideration

Add columns to the Rule Analysis table

The Rule Analysis table should include all of the columns supported within the Rules table, including Rule Conditions, Rule Conclusions, Priority, Ruleset, Ruleset Priority, etc.
about 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments 0 Future consideration

Force the system to register specific characters as normal text

Characters which provide specific function within Safer Payments such as (),{},~,*,? cannot be interpreted as plain text for rule writing. Merchant names, for example, may enter the system with these characters.
about 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments 0 Future consideration

Allow for the reference of Rule Name, Rule UID, and Rule Comment within a conclusion

Would like the ability to reference the Rule Name, Rule UID, or Rule Comment within a conclusion. For rule auditing, we may assign unique values to an overwritable input on a rule by rule basis. Safer Payments already inherently assigns a Unique V...
about 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments 0 Future consideration

Automatic reconciliation of references when an attribute is deleted

When an attribute needs to be deleted, the UI will throw an error advising of any references to said attribute. There could be multiple queries, rules, or other model components using a particular attribute, resulting in dozens or even hundreds of...
about 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments 0 Future consideration

Internal notification process for changes to the API Instance

When many users are logged into the system and a change the active API instance is required (for example, switching the API from instance 1 to instance 2), administrators should have an option to deliver a notification to any active users advising...
about 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments 2 Future consideration

Integrate Case Transition with MEMO Save

Currently users have to enter memos and then save them and then transition the case to close. It would be helpful to have the memos automatically save when cases are transitioned from one state to another to avoid any lost messages.
about 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments 0 Not under consideration