Skip to Main Content
IBM Data and AI RegTech Ideas Portal

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea

Help IBM prioritize your ideas and requests

The IBM team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The offering manager team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at IBM works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.

Receive notification on the decision

Some ideas can be implemented at IBM, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.


For product documentation, see Knowledge Center.
Create and View Support Cases and Use the Discussion Forum here

Shorter URL for this site is: http://ibm.biz/WFS-Ideas or https://ibm.biz/RegTech-Ideas

ADD A NEW IDEA

FILTER BY CATEGORY

FTM for Check Services

Showing 28

Flag on the Operations_Status_Groups Screen indicating a file has been researched.

From Top Ten: Citizens (Gus Penedo), Item Number: 2018005, Votes: 3, IBM T-Shirt: 3.2 Provide a user the ability to flag a rejected file as researched to prevent duplicate work. Possibly include a reason that is assigned and could be filtered ...

Provide a method to further filter Image Review criteria.

From Top Ten: Regions (Ken Maddox)), Item Number: 2018007, Votes: 5, IBM T-Shirt: M Add a process by which FI's can turn off specific image review tests based on their criteria at the item level (RT, Acct, Dollar Amt, or some combination).
over 2 years ago in FTM for Check Services / Transaction Processing - Distribution 0 Future consideration

Un-do option for Image Compliance - This is also RFE 115264

From Top Ten: Citizens (Gus Penedo), Item Number: 2018001, Votes: 16, IBM T-Shirt: L Inability to go back to change decision in Image Compliance and Dupe Detect review. Basically, need an "oops" button similar to Payment Repair
over 2 years ago in FTM for Check Services / Transaction Processing - Distribution 0 Future consideration

Automated Prioritization with Modification

From Top Ten: U.S. Bank (Michelle Wright), Item Number: 2018002, Votes: 20 Global automated prioritization at the file level for all apps with the ability to apply manual prioritization at the file level when needed. Comments: 12/3/18: Not...
over 2 years ago in FTM for Check Services / Transaction Processing - Distribution 1 Future consideration

Make the comment fields on the TCR adjustment window configurable so only the number of comment lines required for a particular adjustment are available / visible to the user.

- Having only the comment lines required for the adjustment visible would make filling out the adjustment window straight forward and more efficient for the user since they will only see the required comment fields rather than having to rely on pr...
almost 3 years ago in FTM for Check Services / Usability 0 Future consideration

Settlement to post a system log error message when the accumulator assigned does not exist in the IZR_ACCUM table with the affected Batch/ICL number

If an item has assigned an accumulator that is not defined in the IZR_ACCUM table, balancer can find the missing money more easily if Settlement posts system log error messages that provides the affected batch/ICL number and invalid accumulator nu...
about 3 years ago in FTM for Check Services / Alerting & Notifications 0 Future consideration

Allow ISNs for inserted items to have a sequence id of 10 - thereby matching traditional CPCS format for easier downstream legacy integration

For items inserted via Auto Adjust and TCR, we need the sequence id to be 10. What might work best is a global setting allowing the customer to set the default device id and sequence id for inserted items. With 3.0.5.1 the device id has been corr...
about 3 years ago in FTM for Check Services / Standards (Protocols, Rule Books, Specifications, etc.) 0 Future consideration

TCR should automatically choose Debit or Credit Adjustment Type is the ADJ CODE can only be a DEBIT or CREDIT

When in TCR you must choose Debit or Credit Transaction type when Inserting an Adjustment. Some Adjustment are DEBIT only or CREDIT only so why does the USER need to select it should be pre-filled with the correct Transaction Type.
over 3 years ago in FTM for Check Services / Usability 0 Future consideration