We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Post your ideas
Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,
Post an idea
Upvote ideas that matter most to you
Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea
Help IBM prioritize your ideas and requests
The IBM team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The offering manager team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at IBM works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.
Receive notification on the decision
Some ideas can be implemented at IBM, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.
For product documentation, see Knowledge Center. Create and View Support Cases and Use the Discussion Forum here
Enable ability to extract data for WORM storage for record retention
System: OpenPagesDescription: Various industries have regulatory requirements to capture and store records to WORM / Long term storage solutions. CMIS is an industry standard API to communicate with WORM solutions and provides the common interface...
Good day Team Please will you advise if IBM will be using multi tenant configuration at a later stage instead of the current single tenant. If so please will you advise on the time line for this. Regards Henk
Admin: Allow to configure Lock/Unlock at Object/Profile level
The Lock/Unlock permission is at a application level. We would like to be able to selectively allow/block that capability by Object Type and/or Profile. There are numerous cases where there exists a need to have more granular control of this feature.
Admin: Allow ability to allow View-only of configuration settings vs. Edit for all
Today if you have access to a particular Administration function, you are able to edit that function. We would like to be able to have a setting that can limit edit capabilities, but allow View of these settings.
Users may have access to entities/objects at a higher level to allow reporting/analysis on an aggregated (rollup data) level. However, these same users may not be allowed to view the details associated with the same data/objects at the child entit...
Admin: Need to expand limit of 32k on Field Namespace
OpenPages currently limits the field namespace to 32k characters.This is a problem for those already defined objects that have over 200 fields and in trying to enhance the object, we run into the space limitation. Also , because we cannot Delete f...
Identify which dependency is causing error message
Errors related to field dependencies should indicate the dependency rule that caused the error message, e.g. "A field not available to you has been made required by a field dependency so you will be unable to continue with this operation." Which d...
There is an admin feature that allows to customize the Actor search screen in OpenPages. But, even after I changed the admin settings in 7.1, it is not taking effect in the screen. He is saying that this feature works in 6.2.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.